Showing posts with label Art. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Art. Show all posts

Tuesday, December 04, 2012

Move Towards Pain

Another little ditty from Mastery.

When John Keats (1795-1821) was eight years old, his father died in a riding accident. His mother never quite got over the loss and died seven years later—essentially leaving John, his two brothers, and one sister orphaned and homeless in London. John, the eldest of the children, was taken out of school by the appointed trustee and guardian of the estate, and enrolled as an apprentice to a surgeon and apothecary—he would have to earn a living as quickly as possible, and this seemed the best career for that.

66_jkeats2In his last few terms at school, Keats had developed a love for literature and reading. To continue his education, he would return to his school in his off hours and read as many books as he could in the library. Some time later, he had the desire to try his hand at writing poetry, but lacking any kind of instructor or literary circle he could frequent, the only way he know to teach himself to write was the read the works of all of the greatest poets of the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries. He then wrote his own poems using the poetic form and style of the particular writer he was trying to model himself after. He had a knack for imitation, and soon he was creating verses in dozens of different styles, always tweaking them a little with his own voice.

Several years into this process, Keats came to a fateful decision—he would devote his life to writing poetry. That was his calling in life and he would find a away to make a living at it. To complete the rigorous apprenticeship he had already put himself through, he decided that what he needed was to write a very long poem, precisely 4000 lines. The poem would revolve around the ancient Greek myth of Endymion. “Endymion,” he wrote a friend, “will be a test, a trial of my Powers of Imagination and chiefly of my invention …—by which I must make 4000 lines of some circumstances and fill them with Poetry.” He gave himself a rather impossible deadline—seven months—and a task of writing fifty lines a day, until he had a rough draft.

Three quarters of the way through, he came to thoroughly hate the poem he was writing. He would not quit, however, willing his way to the end, meeting the deadline he had set. What he did not like about Endymion was the flowery language, the over-writing. But it was only by means of this exercise that he could discover what worked for him. “In Endymion,” he later wrote, “I leaped headlong into the Sea and thereby became better acquainted with the Soundings, the quicksands and the rocks, than if I had stayed upon the green shore and … took tea and comfortable advice.”

In the aftermath of writing what he considered to be a mediocre poem, Keats took stock of all of the invaluable lessons he had learned. Never again would he suffer from writer’s block—he had trained himself to write past any obstacle. He had acquired now the habit of writing quickly, with intensity and focus—concentrating his work in a few hours. He could revise with equal speed. He had learned how to criticize himself and his overly romantic tendencies. He could look at his own work with a cold eye. He had learned that it was in the actual writing of the poem that the best ideas would often come to him, and that he had to boldly keep writing or he would miss such discoveries. Most important of all, as a counterexample of Endymion, he had hit upon a style that suited him—language as compact and dense with imagery as possible, with not a single wasted line.

With these lessons in hand, in the years 1818 to 1819, before he became gravely ill, Keats would produce some of the most memorable poems in the English language, including all of his greatest odes. This added up to perhaps the most productive two years of writing in the history of Western literature—all of it set up by the rigorous self-apprenticeship he had put himself through.

***

By nature, we humans shirk from anything that seems possibly painful or overtly difficult. We bring this natural tendency to our practice of any skill. Once we grow adept at some aspect of this skill, generally one that comes more easily to us, we prefer to practice this element over and over. Our skill becomes lopsided as we avoid our weaknesses. Knowing that in our practice we can let down our guard, since we are not being watched or under pressure to perform, we bring to this a kind of dispersed attention. We tend to also be quite conventional in our practice routines. We generally follow what others have done, performing the accepted exercises for those skills.

This is the path of amateurs. To attain mastery, you must adopt what we shall call Resistance of Practice. The principle is simple—you go in the opposite direction of all of your natural tendencies when it comes to practice. First you resist the temptation to be nice to yourself. You become your own worst critic; you see your work as if through the eyes of others. You recognize your weaknesses, precisely the elements you are not good at. Those are the aspects you give precedence to in your practice. You find a kind of perverse pleasure in moving past the pain this might bring. Second, you resist the lure of easing up on your focus. You train yourself to concentrate in practice with double the intensity, as if it were the real thing times two. In devising your own routines, you become as creative as possible. You invent exercises that work upon your weaknesses. You give yourself arbitrary deadlines to meet certain standards, constantly pushing yourself past perceived limits. In this way, you develop your own standards for excellence, generally higher than those of others.

In the end, your five hours of intense, focused work are the equivalent of ten for most people. Soon enough you will see the results of such practice, and others will marvel at the apparent ease in which you accomplish your deeds.

Tuesday, January 04, 2011

Adverts

Or commercials are you provincials know them. As in: almost all US adverts suck rotten eggs. Luckily, the Brits are incredibly marvelous at producing imaginative and above all, ironic commercials.

So if there are any of you ‘Ad Men’ or women reading this (fat chance, I know), allow me to point you in the direction of the Top Gear ‘Best Car Ads’. Notice the almost effortless, simple, sometimes bizarre way these commercials transfer the need and want to buy via the TV.

Also: notice with what aplomb the accompanying descriptions simply introduce then with that light touch of Englishness, for lack of a better description, snarkily tosses it your way. Now go and do likewise.

Enough jibber jabber, go forth.

Friday, June 04, 2010

Ex Libris


Ex Libris is a term (literally “from the books”) inscribed on the pages of a book to denote ownership. It can also refer to a bookplate, some of which are works of art.

Monday, February 22, 2010

Tuesday, October 09, 2007

Slave Ship

Slave Ship (Slavers Throwing Overboard the Dead and Dying, Typhoon Coming On).

This 1840 painting by J. M. W. Turner is terrible in its magnificence. I finally got to see the last of my recorded Schama's Power of Art program on Turner this weekend and it held me spellbound. Especially this picture, dealing as it does with slavery and the inhumanity of it all. Here we have a maelstrom of death and everything horrid, concentrated in one monstrous, terrifying cacophony of malevolent color—or is it? At the top right of the picture is what seems to be an expanding patch of blue that signals, perhaps, better days ahead.

Of course, it's not all color. Look closely and you'll see content: slaves drowning, and the sea monsters feeding on the poor souls. In the bottom-right corner, Turner's got a disembodied leg with the iron shackles still attached, sticking up. Just look at it, it's furious and lamentable, as if God is really, truly pissed at the fuckers on that ship, that forlorn ship tossed about in the sea spray. Right down the middle is a path of calm that leads to that columnar splash of light. Incredible.

To call this powerful is an understatement. Interestingly, Turner was laughed at for doing this painting. I believe, as does Schama, that this work is one of the best paintings of its time.

Thursday, August 02, 2007

Religion

By rights and tradition, I'm a Christian. An utterly non-functioning one, with many doubts. Oh, I believe in God all right. But sometimes, on certain days, when the wind stops blowing and the sun grinds to a halt, a flitting doubt raises its head and asks, what if? like an antithetical Still Small Voice.

If I were anything else religious, I'd have been a Buddhist. I am attracted to the almost philosophical (read logical) approach to religion, two bitter enemies ordinarily. Well, maybe not bitter, but certainly strange bedfellows.

Then I realized that in many ways, Buddhism's central tenets take control out of one's hands. It's too easy to say eh, toss up the hands and settle down into some deep lotus position, eight muthafuckin' path, deep meditation and let the world spin on. Karma, neh?

I appreciate the futility of keeping too hard a grip on life which is like attempting to hold on to a spinning top, but yea gods, surely, we can do something? Like the American I have become, I am intensely uncomfortable doing something by doing nothing.

I dabbled with atheism for all of a few months. Again, it appealed to a deeply held sense and love of logic, and that flitting doubt I spoke of earlier seemed satisfied when I answered no god. However, I believe Man is incomplete without a spirituality; a need, if you will, to believe in something or someone Greater Than oneself. I don't recall who originally said it, but if God didn't exist, it would have been necessary to invent him. Of course, the staunch atheist would say that is exactly the case. More power to them.

All I know is, there are a ton of atheists who scream like petulant children seeking attention, each one bearing some puerile, half-baked grudge against God. Cries of You Don't Exist! with shaking fists litter in their wake along with mostly unfunny attempts to shock(!) those fucking Christians, as if that were so brave. I'd really like to see one of them put their money where their mouth was and utter the same in front of your friendly neighborhood Islamofascist.

Sheesh, way to go off trail. This all started because I saw that one of my favorite blogs, Dark Roasted Blend, featured the construction and destruction of a Mandala:

Incredibly intricate, monks traditionally constructed these with finely-ground colored stones after creating a design on a surface.

After back-breaking work and intense concentration, the monks simply and ritualistically destroy the work:

Signifying the transience and futility (perhaps?) of life.

Zhaozhou questioned two new arrivals at his temple.

He asked the first monk, “Have you been here before?”

The monk said, “No, I haven't.”

Zhaozhou said, “Have a cup of tea.”

Then he asked the second monk, “Have you been here before?”

The monk said, “Yes, I have.”

Zhaozhou said, “Have a cup of tea.”

The head monk asked, “Setting aside the fact that you told the one who'd never been here before to have a cup of tea, why did you tell the one who had been here before the same thing?”

Zhaozhou said, “Head monk!”

The head monk responded, “Yes?”

Zhaozhou said, “Have a cup of tea.”

Friday, July 20, 2007

Graffiti

Browsing Dark Roasted Blend this morning, I caught this series of the Best Graffiti Showcase. Here's a taste:

Apathy

The ever-popular Banksy:

Banksy

This truism:

Opium

How's this for street art:

Face

Wow!

Friday, July 06, 2007

Nec Spe Nec Metu

Last night, as the tendrils of sleep crawled over my eyelids coaxing them together, my brain's upper functions attempted to fight back because I was watching an episode of Schama's The Power of Art. This episode was about the “bad boy” of 17th century art: Michelangelo da Caravaggio.

476px-Michelangelo_Caravaggio_018 In the series, Schama intelligently and somewhat coyly, it seems, narrates the tale behind a particular representative painting of the artist's. In this episode, we learn about a painting finished in the early 1600s when Caravaggio is supposed to be on the run from a charge of murder: David with the head of Goliath.

[Click for larger]

Caravaggio paints himself as the grotesque Goliath's head. It is a dark painting, full of reproach and despair, very powerful.

Alas, sleep won over and I lapsed.

“Nec spe nec metu” ( without hope or fear) was the motto of a bunch of rowdies in Rome of which Michelangeo Caravaggio was one.